Posts Tagged ‘active citizenship’

 

Where next for localism and co-production?

Tuesday, April 3rd, 2012

On 15 March 2012, Involve co-hosted with Consumer Focus a seminar exploring ‘where next for localism and co-production?’ The event brought together a group of 27 individuals from national government, local government, the voluntary and community sector, the social innovation field, academia and think tanks to explore some of the challenges and opportunities for localism and co-production in the coming years.

As well as some case studies of localism and co-production being put into action, the seminar drew upon two pieces of research:

  • Pathways through Participation, and
  • Hands Up and Hands On’ – a new research report, launched at the event, by Consumer Focus.

The ‘Hands Up and Hands On’ research explores citizens’ attitudes towards greater localism and their appetite for greater involvement. The findings provide some reasons to be optimistic, with a sizeable number of people (28%) saying they’d like to have more input into local services. But it also highlights the need to understand and acknowledge how this differs across communities and be realistic about what the level of involvement is that people want.

It’s findings on why people do and do not get involved are strikingly consistent in many respects with our Pathways through Participation findings. For example, it too found the importance of ‘personal connection to an issue’, ‘social connection to others who are involved’ and ‘circumstances’ to involvement being triggered.

In terms of why people are not contributing more, it picks out five reasons:

  • They don’t know about opportunities – at best only 1 in 6 people felt well-informed about existing opportunities, and in some instances that fell to 1 in 10.
  • They don’t have the time – this is compounded by the concern that they’ll be drawn into doing more than they want.
  • They don’t have faith in local authorities – they feel disempowered from engaging with local government structures and don’t feel they have a voice.
  • They don’t want to participate with the “usual suspects” – they are concerned about cliques who forward their own views rather than engaging in others.
  • They don’t believe that their involvement will make a difference – perhaps because of a previous unsuccessful experience.

The ‘Hands Up and Hands On’ report is well worth a read and can be found here: http://www.consumerfocus.org.uk/publications/hands-up-and-hands-on-understanding-the-new-opportunities-for-localism.

A report of the ‘Where next for localism and co-production’ seminar can be found here: http://wherenextlocalism.posterous.com/

Pathways through Participation final report launched!

Tuesday, September 13th, 2011

Today, 13 September 2011, the Pathways through Participation project team launched its final report. The project started 2.5 years ago and is now reporting on its findings.

Both the final report and the summary report are available to download from the resources section of the website.

Follow #pthwys on Twitter for updates from the launch and to contribute to the debate. As ever, we greatly value your feedback, so please take some time, if you are able, to leave us comments on this post.

To whet your appetite, here is the foreword to the report:

The National Council for Voluntary Organisations (NCVO), the Institute for Volunteering Research (IVR) and Involve are pleased to publish this important new report about how people participate in society. Pathways through Participation is an ambitious research project that aims to improve our understanding of how and why people participate, how their involvement changes over time, and what pathways, if any, exist between different types of activities.

The project emerged from a common desire across our three organisations to create a fuller picture of how people participate over their lifetimes. It builds on work completed at NCVO on active citizenship, adds to IVR’s research into volunteering by exploring it in relation to other forms of participation, and extends Involve’s research and practice in empowering citizens to take and influence the decisions that affect their lives. National and local governments have grappled for decades with the challenges of how to encourage people to be more active citizens. Their reasons have varied over time, from improving public services to reducing public spending or enhancing democracy. Recent policy developments around localism, the Big Society, outsourcing public services, encouraging charitable giving and the role of the voluntary sector have made questions about participation more topical than ever.

This report provides the practical intelligence that will enable voluntary and community organisations, public service providers and government at all levels to better support and develop participation. It is only through hearing people’s personal stories, and focusing on their individual experience, that the complexities and dynamics of how participation works in practice can be fully understood. We interviewed over 100 people across three localities – their stories of participation provide the powerful body of evidence drawn on in this report.

This research shows that people participate in a myriad of ways, depending on what has meaning and value to them. They participate as individuals and collectively. Their reasons for participating are sometimes altruistic and sometimes it is to achieve something more explicitly for themselves. We have found many stories of how life enhancing participation can be, but also of its negative effects. Participation can be a core part of people’s lives or something they do once in a while. It doesn’t happen in a bubble but connects to different aspects of their lives. And it is shaped by their circumstances and capabilities, as well as the personal, practical and political opportunities and barriers they face.

We hope that policy-makers, practitioners and researchers will find this report useful in developing a richer and fuller understanding of how and why people participate, and what makes them start and continue (and stop) participating. Beyond promoting understanding, we hope that this report will help institutions and organisations find ways in which they can support and encourage opportunities for participation that better meet people’s

Sir Stuart Etherington, NCVO
Simon Burall, Involve
Nick Ockenden, IVR

Final report to be launched on 13th September

Friday, August 19th, 2011

The Pathways through Participation final report will be launched on the 13th September, which is now less than a month away! This will be the culmination of this two-and-a-half year research project into active citizenship, led by the National Council for Voluntary Organisations (NCVO) in partnership with the Institute for Volunteering Research (IVR) and Involve, and funded by the Big Lottery Fund.

The project has explored how and why people get involved and stay involved in different forms of participation over their lives, building on the existing evidence base by examining participation from the perspective of the individual and exploring the links between different activities and episodes of participation throughout people’s lives.

Along with the final report, we will also be publishing a project summary which will set out our key findings and recommendations for future policy and practice. You can sign up to our newsletter (via the box to the right) to have the report emailed to you, or else check back on here on the 13th September to download it.

Measuring active citizenship

Wednesday, July 27th, 2011

The RSA has recently published – ‘The Civic Pulse’ - a report that takes the first steps towards developing a new model for measuring active citizenship, or more specifically ‘the presence or absence of key mechanisms and social assets driving participation’. With our focus on exploring ‘what creates and sustains active citizenship’, I am very interested in the development of this model.

The authors of the report identify that in the current policy, social and economic contexts, and with the loss of the Citizenship and Place Surveys, ‘…local policymakers need a new way of measuring active citizenship which can identify both “civic assets” as well as areas of “civic need” within communities, and which can be used to fashion appropriate interventions to stimulate levels of participation.’

The Civic Pulse model is based on a meta-theory of Republican Liberalism which ‘considers active citizenship to be a social right and civic obligation’ placing ‘particular emphasis on developing the ability of people to shape their own lives and the life of their communities and public institutions.’

The authors draw upon previous measurement models (including WARM, The Vitality Index, CLEAR and The Citizen Audit) to establish four principles for the Civic Pulse model; it must:

  • ‘Get beyond satisfaction and opinions’;
  • ‘Measure subjective drivers of active citizenship behaviour’;
  • ‘Measure more nuanced drivers of active citizenship’; and
  • ‘Look at social assets, not just deficits’.

And they identify three groups of models of participation from which they establish key drivers of active citizenship:

  • Structural models, which emphasise the ‘social norms and resources people have’;
  • Choice models, which consider the ‘informed choices people make’; and
  • Capacity models, which highlight people’s personal skills, knowledge and attitudes.

Based on these principles, models and drivers they establish a framework with five dimensions:

  • ‘Know-how’, including skills and knowledge;
  • ‘Attitudes’, including other-regarding and resilience and wellbeing;
  • ‘Relations’, including horizontal and vertical;
  • ‘Institutions’, including local groups, local services, and the local authority; and
  • ‘Resources’, including income, wealth and education.

Our findings from Pathways through Participation (which will be published in September) support the importance of all of these dimensions to if and how people participate, from intrinsic motivations (including altruism, self-interest and reciprocity) and resources (including skills, knowledge and confidence) to extrinsic resources (including relationships and social networks) and opportunities (including groups and organisations, and local environment and place). The Civic Pulse looks to be a good step towards measuring active citizenship.