Posts Tagged ‘fieldwork’

 

News from the field….on interviewing

Thursday, September 2nd, 2010

As we get close to completing the in-depth interviews, it seems a good moment to share some of my experiences as the researcher responsible for the suburban case study (Enfield) on this key part of the research project.

The interviews are at the heart of the Pathways project as it is through these that we are gathering people’s rich and varied life stories of participation. When looking for people to interview, we have a number of things in mind: How heavily is the person involved in an activity (be it volunteering at a local theatre or taking part in a resident’s association)? Are we speaking to people from a range of activities and sites of participation, identified in the earlier fieldwork stage in the mapping workshops? Are we interviewing people from a range of different backgrounds, ages, ethnicities, and so on?

Getting this balance has proved tricky, partly because it is impossible to know the extent and variety of someone’s participation until you start speaking with them. Take, for example, a recent interview I had with a school governor who had also been volunteering for the local hospital radio for nearly 30 years – something I couldn’t have known without sitting down with him and asking him to reflect on all of his participation experience.

Regular meetings and updates between the researchers have helped us recruit a good mix of interviewees across the three fieldwork sites (Enfield, Leeds and Suffolk). These meetings have also really helped us maintain a sense of coherence across the fieldwork areas, to learn from each other’s experiences and share emerging ideas. We have agreed that asking people to draw a timeline of their history of participation history really helps to focus the interview and to make connections between different periods of someone’s life.

I have been surprised and touched by the time and effort that people have made to meet with me and tell me their story, and pleased that most participants have been positive about the experience. Some encounters have been very moving, as people share personal reasons for their participation (or why they have stopped participating, either now or in the past). The fascinating conversations I’ve been having with people are making me think not only about participation from the perspective of the Pathways research but also from a more personal level about my own participation and history of involvement – something I hadn’t banked on!

Using participatory mapping to explore participation

Monday, June 28th, 2010

The project team’s latest report is now available for download. ‘Using participatory mapping to explore participation in three communities’ illustrates the history of participatory mapping as a versatile research tool, demonstrating its potential use in a variety of scenarios. The report then explains our approach to mapping within the Pathways through Participation project, and discusses the emergent findings and our reflections on the method.

Click here to download the report.

Participatory mapping in Leeds

Monday, April 26th, 2010

Last month saw local mapping workshops being carried out in all three case-study areas. Two workshops took place in each case-study area, and you can find out more about the session in Suffolk here, and the Enfield workshop here. All the workshops intended to not only begin to explore local understandings and perspectives of participation, but also explore where participation happens in the local area and beyond; the sites, spaces, places and opportunities to participate.

The sessions held in inner-city Leeds were fascinating. We had some real stimulating discussions about what participation means to different people and why it is important. People’s perceptions were really varied, for example ‘having a voice’, ‘making a difference’, ‘inclusion’, ‘learning new skills’ and ‘companionship’. It all made for some very thought provoking conversations. The mapping element entailed groups working together to build a map of their local area, which they then populated with sites and opportunities for participation. Not only did this make for some very colourful depictions of the local area, but provided the project team with useful information about the areas people participate. The participants seemed to really enjoy discussing their local area and relished being asked about things that are important to them.

The workshops have helped us to prepare for the next stage of the research. In drawing on local knowledge and identifying the assorted sites of participation in the local area, we have a better idea of where we can find a diverse sample of people for the interviews that we will soon be carrying out. In the near future we will be writing a report of the mapping sessions and the use of community mapping as a research method, so watch this space!

Participatory mapping in Enfield

Wednesday, April 21st, 2010

I recently facilitated two participatory mapping workshops in Enfield in outer London, the ‘suburban’ fieldwork area. These workshops aimed to get a feel for the ‘where’ bit of the Pathways research: where do people go to take part? What are the main ‘sites’ of participation in the local area? What are the key places that residents identify as important? And, what happens in these places?

The richness and diversity of places and the different ways in which people get involved in the area was striking - from the very local (e.g. Friends of Parks groups) to the global (e.g. fundraising for international causes through local churches or the activist network of the local fair trade group).

Mapping was a really effective way of gathering local people’s knowledge: I learnt a lot about the area that I hadn’t from talking to individuals, walking around observing the area and reading newspapers and reports. Participants were also positive about the experience of taking part: some fed back that they had enjoyed creating the maps, and others commented that they were surprised (and pleased) that they lived in a place where so much is happening.  

You can find out more about the Leeds workshops here, and the sessions in Suffolk here. And look out for our forthcoming report on all three mapping sessions, including our thoughts on the pros and cons of using this research method.

News from the field: Suffolk

Thursday, December 17th, 2009

The research in Suffolk is developing well and lots has happened over the last months.

With the help of our local partners – the Suffolk Association of Voluntary Organisations, and its member organisation, the Suffolk Volunteering Federation – I’ve been able to talk to a huge variety of people and organisations. Contacts range from local voluntary organisations to statutory organisations that work in the wider region of West Suffolk and beyond, as well as individuals who live and work in Suffolk. I’ve been visiting the local Community Partnership organisation, Young Suffolk and a Volunteer Centre. I’ve also the good fortune to attend the West Suffolk Local Strategic Partnership Annual Conference. This enabled me to experience ‘participation’ first hand, and to get a feel for how consultation about the community strategy is conducted and what the key concerns are of the delegates from across West Suffolk.

Basic things like popping into the local newsagents have also been hugely informative. Not only did I discover that that there are two rival local papers, but also that the local newsagents carry papers in Polish, Turkish and Italian, indicating some of the minority languages spoken in the area. The local papers carry a lot of relevant information relating to a wide variety of participatory activities – from donating to charity, the organisation of charity walks, to updates on recent developments in the local volunteer centre and the tensions between local councillors and residents over planning issues.

News from the field: Leeds

Thursday, December 17th, 2009

Since Leeds was confirmed as the inner-city area for the project I have been meeting with various key stakeholders to introduce the project and find out a bit more about the participation scene in the city. Some of the people interested in the project and who I have met include various members of the local authority; the Primary Care Trust; a social enterprise; the chair of the VCFS strategy group; the volunteer development manager at Leeds Volunteer Centre; a key member of the local strategic partnership and a variety of volunteers and local activists.

Whilst exploring the wider area of Leeds, I have learned of some interesting participation sites and events. This included a former primary school that had recently been occupied by local residents who were campaigning for the building to be saved for community use, as well as various exciting events being organised for next year’s Leeds Year of Volunteering. With the help of Voluntary Action Leeds and other partnering organisations, we are now close to deciding on the smaller, case-study area within the city.

News from the field: Enfield

Thursday, December 17th, 2009

Just over a month into the field work has seen me walking about with a camera and notebook and meeting people in different parts of Enfield – a north London borough and our selected ‘suburban’ area. Paula Jeffery, the Chief Executive of Enfield Voluntary Action (EVA) and one of our key partners, has given me some valuable insight into the area through sharing her local knowledge – its history, its geography and some of its defining characteristics. So far I’ve met with people from all three sectors – voluntary (e.g. the Volunteer Centre), statutory (e.g. Police and Local Authority) and private (e.g. Chamber of Commerce).

Many of Enfield’s voluntary and community sector infrastructure organisations (e.g. Enfield Disability Action and the Volunteer Centre) are based in the same building called ‘Community House’ – a friendly place in the south east of the borough with a volunteer-ran café open to the public. A large number of north London’s business infrastructure organisations (e.g. Enfield Business and Retailers Association) are housed in the north east of the borough in the same building, called ‘Enfield Business Centre’. These infrastructure ‘hubs’ seem to really facilitate collaboration and communication – something that one of my interviewees commented on.  

A helpful conversation with a head of service at the Local Authority, walking about making observations and visiting an exhibition at London’s Museum of Transport, are helping me narrow down my fieldwork area to an approximate 2 mile square patch based around three Underground stations. The combination of excellent transport links to the city centre and an abundance of 1930s semis should make this fertile ‘suburban’ ground for the research to take place in.

Fieldwork areas now selected

Friday, November 13th, 2009

We are delighted to announce that we have now selected our three areas for the project’s fieldwork. These are Leeds for the inner-city area, Enfield for the suburban area and Suffolk for the rural area. In each area we will be working with a broad range of stakeholders, and particularly with Voluntary Action Leeds, Enfield Voluntary Action and SAVO (Suffolk Association of Voluntary Organisations) who will be our key partners and will chair our local stakeholder groups. With the help of these partners and others we will select a smaller area at neighbourhood level in which we will conduct the activity mapping sessions and in-depth interviews (for more information see our approach and methods page).