Posts Tagged ‘interviews’

 

Approach to analysis

Tuesday, February 1st, 2011

The volume of information that we’ve gathered on the Pathways project so far is massive and we’re currently in the process of trying to make sense of the rich and varied stories we heard from the people we interviewed. Each interview was recorded and then transcribed and we have between 15-30 pages of text for each interview that needs to be read, digested and analysed. We are using a piece of software called NVivo to help manage, structure and make sense of this interview data.

The first phase of the analysis involved each researcher summarising and then ‘coding’ the interviews they had carried out. Coding involves highlighting pieces of text that stands out as illustrating one of the themes or topics we had agreed were important. As a project team we had many discussions about these themes which provided the starting point for the coding, although the researchers added in additional codes that we thought were valuable or useful as we went along. This was, in theoretical terms, using a combination of grounded theory where the researchers allow themes to emerge in response to what they are reading from the ‘bottom up’ and a ‘top down’ or structural approach where the hypotheses developed throughout the project are ‘super imposed’ on the data.

After this first phase of analysis we got together and ‘merged’ our three separate NVivo ‘projects’ or databases. We are now looking at the whole codes, such as ‘life stage’ and ‘challenges to participating’ from across all three of the case study areas in order to look for patterns, trends and surprises in the data. We’ll be testing out what we find in workshops in the case study areas in March.

News from the field….on interviewing

Thursday, September 2nd, 2010

As we get close to completing the in-depth interviews, it seems a good moment to share some of my experiences as the researcher responsible for the suburban case study (Enfield) on this key part of the research project.

The interviews are at the heart of the Pathways project as it is through these that we are gathering people’s rich and varied life stories of participation. When looking for people to interview, we have a number of things in mind: How heavily is the person involved in an activity (be it volunteering at a local theatre or taking part in a resident’s association)? Are we speaking to people from a range of activities and sites of participation, identified in the earlier fieldwork stage in the mapping workshops? Are we interviewing people from a range of different backgrounds, ages, ethnicities, and so on?

Getting this balance has proved tricky, partly because it is impossible to know the extent and variety of someone’s participation until you start speaking with them. Take, for example, a recent interview I had with a school governor who had also been volunteering for the local hospital radio for nearly 30 years – something I couldn’t have known without sitting down with him and asking him to reflect on all of his participation experience.

Regular meetings and updates between the researchers have helped us recruit a good mix of interviewees across the three fieldwork sites (Enfield, Leeds and Suffolk). These meetings have also really helped us maintain a sense of coherence across the fieldwork areas, to learn from each other’s experiences and share emerging ideas. We have agreed that asking people to draw a timeline of their history of participation history really helps to focus the interview and to make connections between different periods of someone’s life.

I have been surprised and touched by the time and effort that people have made to meet with me and tell me their story, and pleased that most participants have been positive about the experience. Some encounters have been very moving, as people share personal reasons for their participation (or why they have stopped participating, either now or in the past). The fascinating conversations I’ve been having with people are making me think not only about participation from the perspective of the Pathways research but also from a more personal level about my own participation and history of involvement – something I hadn’t banked on!