Posts Tagged ‘public participation’

 

Where next for localism and co-production?

Tuesday, April 3rd, 2012

On 15 March 2012, Involve co-hosted with Consumer Focus a seminar exploring ‘where next for localism and co-production?’ The event brought together a group of 27 individuals from national government, local government, the voluntary and community sector, the social innovation field, academia and think tanks to explore some of the challenges and opportunities for localism and co-production in the coming years.

As well as some case studies of localism and co-production being put into action, the seminar drew upon two pieces of research:

  • Pathways through Participation, and
  • Hands Up and Hands On’ – a new research report, launched at the event, by Consumer Focus.

The ‘Hands Up and Hands On’ research explores citizens’ attitudes towards greater localism and their appetite for greater involvement. The findings provide some reasons to be optimistic, with a sizeable number of people (28%) saying they’d like to have more input into local services. But it also highlights the need to understand and acknowledge how this differs across communities and be realistic about what the level of involvement is that people want.

It’s findings on why people do and do not get involved are strikingly consistent in many respects with our Pathways through Participation findings. For example, it too found the importance of ‘personal connection to an issue’, ‘social connection to others who are involved’ and ‘circumstances’ to involvement being triggered.

In terms of why people are not contributing more, it picks out five reasons:

  • They don’t know about opportunities – at best only 1 in 6 people felt well-informed about existing opportunities, and in some instances that fell to 1 in 10.
  • They don’t have the time – this is compounded by the concern that they’ll be drawn into doing more than they want.
  • They don’t have faith in local authorities – they feel disempowered from engaging with local government structures and don’t feel they have a voice.
  • They don’t want to participate with the “usual suspects” – they are concerned about cliques who forward their own views rather than engaging in others.
  • They don’t believe that their involvement will make a difference – perhaps because of a previous unsuccessful experience.

The ‘Hands Up and Hands On’ report is well worth a read and can be found here: http://www.consumerfocus.org.uk/publications/hands-up-and-hands-on-understanding-the-new-opportunities-for-localism.

A report of the ‘Where next for localism and co-production’ seminar can be found here: http://wherenextlocalism.posterous.com/

Pathways through Participation final report launched!

Tuesday, September 13th, 2011

Today, 13 September 2011, the Pathways through Participation project team launched its final report. The project started 2.5 years ago and is now reporting on its findings.

Both the final report and the summary report are available to download from the resources section of the website.

Follow #pthwys on Twitter for updates from the launch and to contribute to the debate. As ever, we greatly value your feedback, so please take some time, if you are able, to leave us comments on this post.

To whet your appetite, here is the foreword to the report:

The National Council for Voluntary Organisations (NCVO), the Institute for Volunteering Research (IVR) and Involve are pleased to publish this important new report about how people participate in society. Pathways through Participation is an ambitious research project that aims to improve our understanding of how and why people participate, how their involvement changes over time, and what pathways, if any, exist between different types of activities.

The project emerged from a common desire across our three organisations to create a fuller picture of how people participate over their lifetimes. It builds on work completed at NCVO on active citizenship, adds to IVR’s research into volunteering by exploring it in relation to other forms of participation, and extends Involve’s research and practice in empowering citizens to take and influence the decisions that affect their lives. National and local governments have grappled for decades with the challenges of how to encourage people to be more active citizens. Their reasons have varied over time, from improving public services to reducing public spending or enhancing democracy. Recent policy developments around localism, the Big Society, outsourcing public services, encouraging charitable giving and the role of the voluntary sector have made questions about participation more topical than ever.

This report provides the practical intelligence that will enable voluntary and community organisations, public service providers and government at all levels to better support and develop participation. It is only through hearing people’s personal stories, and focusing on their individual experience, that the complexities and dynamics of how participation works in practice can be fully understood. We interviewed over 100 people across three localities – their stories of participation provide the powerful body of evidence drawn on in this report.

This research shows that people participate in a myriad of ways, depending on what has meaning and value to them. They participate as individuals and collectively. Their reasons for participating are sometimes altruistic and sometimes it is to achieve something more explicitly for themselves. We have found many stories of how life enhancing participation can be, but also of its negative effects. Participation can be a core part of people’s lives or something they do once in a while. It doesn’t happen in a bubble but connects to different aspects of their lives. And it is shaped by their circumstances and capabilities, as well as the personal, practical and political opportunities and barriers they face.

We hope that policy-makers, practitioners and researchers will find this report useful in developing a richer and fuller understanding of how and why people participate, and what makes them start and continue (and stop) participating. Beyond promoting understanding, we hope that this report will help institutions and organisations find ways in which they can support and encourage opportunities for participation that better meet people’s

Sir Stuart Etherington, NCVO
Simon Burall, Involve
Nick Ockenden, IVR

Encouraging participation: the role of community-based organisations

Wednesday, August 24th, 2011

Community Matters have  produced a new report  Encouraging participation: the role of community-based organisations  that explores the difference multi-purpose community organisations make to formal and informal political participation in their neighbourhoods. It summarises the findings of an 18 month community research project led by IVAR (Institute for Voluntary Action Research) in collaboration with several volunteer community researchers who were based in seven case study organisations.

Rather than just looking at political participation per se, we were delighted to see that the project had adopted the three categories of participation in our literature review (social participation, public participation and individual participation) to capture the full contribution of multi-purpose organisations to community life, social action and political self-confidence. 

The report “suggests it may not always be helpful to divide community activities into ‘political’ and ‘non-political’ types or suggest a hierarchical ladder towards participation. The experiences highlighted in this research indicate that groups which may appear as purely social or leisure in nature can play a vital role in shaping a community’s potential and actual political influence. The experiences highlighted in this research indicate that groups which may appear as purely social or leisure in nature can play a vital role in shaping a community’s potential and actual political influence.”

The findings from the Pathways project which will be made available in September will confirm some of the report’s key messages: many of our interviewees highlighted the importance of multi-purpose hubs in providing spaces for groups to meet, fostering interaction between groups, supporting neighbourhood-level social networks, and linking different organisations and activities.

Participation: trends, facts and figures

Friday, March 4th, 2011

NCVO launched this week a new publication called Participation: trends, facts and figures. Aimed at practitioners and policy-makers searching for information on the state of participation in the UK, this publication draws together trends, facts and statistics relating to participation from a range of different sources. The publication addresses the following key questions:

  • Who participates?
  • Where do people participate?
  • What do people participate in?
  • Why do people participate?

It looks at whether there has been decline in participation over the last decades and includes some international comparisons. It also examines in more detail a number of specific participatory activities (membership, giving, volunteering, timebanking, ethical consumerism, political participation, local governance, campaigning and direct action and protest).